top of page

THE WHISTLEBLOWER FILES
SECTION C: 
schwab Live data vs. historical balances

black-textured-background_926199-8358.avif
black-textured-background_926199-8358.avif

Note regarding excerpts from and references to attachments:

  •  I utilize excerpts from the respective source documents to help streamline the presentation of the facts.  (e.g. [B.13] refers to page 13 of Attachment B.)   Please reference the Attachment files to see the full original source documents.

  • The Appendix contains the full Brokerage Statements1099-B Tax Statement, and a few other documents that are referenced throughout the analyses.
     

PROVEN FACTS 

SECTION C: SCHWAB LIVE DATA VS. HISTORICAL BALANCES

#1
pages  1-6

#2
page 7

#3
pages 8-11

#4
pages 12-15

#5
pages 16-18

#6
pages 18-19

#7
pages 20-22

#8
page 22

#9
pages 23-24

#10
page 25

#11
pages 26-30

#12
page 31

Discrepancies exist in the March 23, 2018 account figures that cannot be explained by the exclusion of the Futures Account from the Historical Data.

​

In the Live Data for March 23rd, the Day Change implies an Account Value for March 22nd that conflicts with the “Historical Balances”, and this discrepancy is precisely equal to the Futures Account value.

​

Cash value was also concealed at the start of the day on March 23 by altering the Trade Date Balance (indicating the cash available at the start of the day).  FOUR different values are stated by the various records.

​

Additional issues regarding the Bank Sweep and the SMA balances for March 22nd further evidence how the historical data conflicts with the live balances, and moreover offers insight into how funds were targeted for concealment and theft in real time.

​

No margin debt (or any other debt) is shown in the “Live Balances” at the end of March 23rd, however a Balance Subject to Interest is reported in the Historical data.  Comparison to the March Statement reveals further discrepancies.

​

On March 26th, The Live Balances display a value for “Funds Available: Cash + Borrowing” that is LESS THAN “Funds Available: Cash Investments”, thereby implying a negative value for ‘Funds Available to Borrow.’ 

​

Several accounting discrepancies between the Live and Historical Balances for March 27th involve the same types of issues identified in the March 23rd account figures. 

​

The unreconciled discrepancies between the Live and Historical Balances on March 23rd and 27th precisely correspond to the amount of an unexplained, unjustified Balance Subject to Interest appears in the Live Balances for on April 13. 

​

Overall, eliminating the Futures Account from the Historical Balances was problematic because the Margin debt was not adjusted accordingly to account for the Sweep to Futures (that generated Margin Debts because the funds were held in the Bank Sweep Feature at the time of the Sweep to Futures).  The various other contrivances operated in concert so to conceal this value ever having existed.

​

A Margin Call was issued during the afternoon of March 27, and the next morning this debt was cancelled—apparently—by issuing a “Money Due” for a negative amount.  

​

The account data for March 28th also contain discrepancies relating to the Futures Account, Gain/Loss, and Cash Accounting.

​

Superscripts throughout the Live and Historical data indicate that account balances were continuously manipulated.

BUTTON - 0Up Arrow.jpg
BUTTON - 0Right Arrow.jpg

© 2035 by T.S. Hewitt. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page